战斗机总体布置的边界设计与聚类分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国航空工业集团公司成都飞机设计研究所,成都 610091

作者简介:

通讯作者:

左健巍,男,工程师,E-mail: jianweizuo@mail.nwpu.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

V221

基金项目:


Boundary Design and Clustering Analysis in General Arrangement for Fighters
Author:
Affiliation:

AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Design & Research Institute, Chengdu 610091, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为量化战斗机总体布置设计过程并构造决策模型,提出了针对总体布置的边界设计与聚类分析方法。首先,提出了边界波动风险指标,通过将边界波动风险指标调整为非负,实现从初始舱位定义到细化舱位定义的更新。同时,根据边界波动风险由高到低的排序,可以筛选出p截强边界,定义了使用p截强边界构造p截强区域的方法。p截强区域可作为总体布置聚类过程中的类。然后,针对聚类分析的实现,提出了针对总体布置的基于朴素贝叶斯的聚类(Naive-Bayes-based clustering, NBC)方法和基于模糊层次分析法的聚类(Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clustering, FAHPC)方法。NBC方法通过对设备进行特征识别,将各个特征进行编码后应用朴素贝叶斯分类器实现分类。FAHPC方法首先构造总体布置的指标体系,使用专家评分法确定各个指标相对于评语集的隶属度,然后使用模糊层次分析法确定准则层和指标层的权重,最后以归一化的综合评分结果作为隶属度来确定分类结果。工程算例验证了所提方法的可行性和实用性。

    Abstract:

    In order to quantify the design process and construct the decision model of general arrangement for fighters, a boundary design method and two clustering analysis methods for general arrangement are proposed. Firstly, a boundary fluctuation risk indicator is introduced, which can be utilized to update an initial cabin definition to a refined cabin definition by non-negativity adjustment. Simultaneously, based on the ranking of boundary fluctuation risk indicators from high to low, p-cut strong boundaries can be selected and a method for constructing p-cut strong regions using these boundaries is defined. The p-cut strong regions can serve as classes in clustering analysis for general arrangement. Then, two methods are proposed for implementing clustering analysis: Naive Bayes-based clustering (NBC) method and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based clustering (FAHPC) method. By feature recognition of equipment, NBC method applies naive Bayes classifier for classification after feature encoding. FAHPC method first constructs an indicator system for general arrangement and uses expert scoring method to determine the membership degree of each indicator relative to the evaluation comment set, and then uses fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to determine weights between the criteria layer and the indicator layer. Finally, normalized comprehensive scores are used as membership degrees to determine classification results. An engineering example validates the feasibility and practicality of the proposed methods.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

左健巍,李军,祝中强,姚远.战斗机总体布置的边界设计与聚类分析[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2026,58(2):339-349

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-12
  • 最后修改日期:2025-08-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-04-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
网站版权 © 南京航空航天大学学报
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司