湿滑道面飞机着陆滑水风险量化分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院,天津 300300

通讯作者:

蔡靖,女,教授,E-mail: jcai@cauc.edu.cn。

中图分类号:

V351.11;U8

基金项目:

中央高校基金项目(3122019103)。


Quantification Analysis of Hydroplaning Risks of Aircraft Landing on Wet Pavement
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Transportation Science and Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [26]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于飞机机载记录仪数据和临界滑水速度提出滑水风险量化指标,将飞机接地滑行全过程纳入滑水分析范围;建立着陆阶段飞机轮胎-积水道面流固耦合仿真模型,考察道面积水分布及接地位置横向漂移影响,以空客A320为代表机型开展案例分析。结果表明,着陆阶段飞机轮胎临界滑水速度较起飞阶段低12%~18%,滑水事故风险更高;道面横坡引起积水不均匀分布,跑道边缘滑水风险高于中线区域;临界滑水速度及滑水风险指标均为关于接地位置横坐标的函数;同等降雨强度条件下滑水风险概率随飞机接地横向分布标准差增大而减小;增大横坡度可加快道面积水排除,2.0%横坡度工况较1.5%时滑水风险降低5.1%~5.6%;降雨强度与飞机滑水风险正相关,由0.8 mm/min增大至2.5 mm/min时滑水风险指标增加约13.1%;该滑水风险量化分析方法可定量描述飞机着陆环境变化影响,滑水判定方式有明显改进。

    Abstract:

    A quantitative index of hydroplaning risks is proposed based on the quick access record data of aircraft and the critical hydroplaning speed. The whole taxiing process is considered. A numerical model of aircraft-tire-wet-pavement during the landing phase is established for the fluid-structure coupling analysis. The influence of water distribution on the pavement surface and the transverse shift of landing position are discussed. Case study of Airbus A320 model is then carried out. Results show that the critical hydroplaning speed during the landing phase is 12%—18% lower than that during the take-off phase. The hydroplaning accident risk is assumed to be higher. The cross slope causes uneven distribution of the accumulated water film on the pavement. The hydroplaning risk near the runway edge is higher than that near the center line area. The critical hydroplaning speed and the hydroplaning risk index are functions of the abscissa of aircraft landing position. The probability of the hydroplaning risk decreases with the increase of the transverse standard deviation of lateral distribution of aircraft landing position under the same rainfall intensity conditions. The raise of the cross slope may promote the drainage capability of pavement, while the hydroplaning risk index under the case of 2.0% cross slope is reduced by 5.1%—5.6%, compared with that under the case of 1.5%. Rain intensity shows a positive correlation with the hydroplaning risk. The risk index is raised nearly 13.1% as the rainfall intensity increased from 0.8 mm/min to 2.5 mm/min. The analyzing procedure proposed in this paper may quantitatively describe the impact of aircraft landing environment variation. The criteria standard of hydroplaning condition can be notably improved.

    参考文献
    [1] VAN ES G W H, ROELEN A L C, KRUIJSEN E A C, et al. Safety aspects of aircraft performance on wet and contaminated runways: NLR-TP—2001-216[R]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory, 2001.
    [2] ONG G P, FWA T F. A stochastic-mechanistic procedure to evaluate aircraft landing hydroplaning risk on runways[C]//Proceedings of Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting. Washington D C, USA: Transportation Research Board, 2011.
    [3] 朱晟泽. 基于路面宏观纹理的轮胎抗滑行为数值模拟研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2017.
    [4] 冯停. 湿滑路面轮胎滑水机理研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2018.
    [5] 朱兴一, 庞亚凤, 杨健, 等.湿滑条件下基于真实纹理道面的机轮着陆滑水行为解析[J].中国公路学报, 2020, 33(10): 159-170.
    [6] 黄晓明, 刘修宇, 曹青青,等.积水路面轮胎部分滑水数值模拟[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(9): 113-121.
    [7] 赵安家,孙丽莹,孟哲理.飞机轮胎滑水与预防控制措施研究综述[J]. 飞机设计, 2015, 35(5): 46-51,80.
    [8] 李岳,蔡靖,宗一鸣.湿滑道面飞机轮胎临界滑水速度数值仿真[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17(5): 90-101.
    [9] HUEBNER R S, REED J R, HENRY J J. Criteria for predicting hydroplaning potential[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1986, 112(5): 549-553.
    [10] VAN ES G W H. Hydroplaning of modern aircraft tires: NLR-TP—2001-242[R]. Amsterdam Netherlands: National Aerospace Laboratory, 2001.
    [11] BENEDETTO A. A decision support system for the safe-ty of airport runways: The case of heavy rainstorms[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2002, 36(8): 665-682.
    [12] FWA T F, ONG G P. Transverse pavement grooving against hydroplaning Ⅱ: Design[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2006, 132(6): 449-457.
    [13] FWA T, PASINDU H,ONG G. Critical rut depth for pavement maintenance based on vehicle skid-ding and hydroplaning consideration[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2012, 138(4): 423-429.
    [14] OH C W, KIM T W, JEONG H Y, et al. Hydroplaning simulation for a straight-grooved tire by using FDM, FEM and an asymptotic method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2008, 22(1): 34-40.
    [15] FWA T F, ANUPAM K, ONG G P. Relative effectiveness of grooves in tire and pavement for reducing vehicle hydroplaning risk[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2010, 2155(1): 73-81.
    [16] 宗一鸣. 湿滑道面条件下轮胎力学行为与飞机着陆安全问题研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2017.
    [17] MA Y, GENG Y, CHEN X. Water distribution influenced by pavement alignment design[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part B Pavements, 2020, 146(4): 04020058.
    [18] 吴建军,袁成松,周曾奎, 等. 短时强降雨对能见度的影响[J].气象科学,2010,30(2): 274-278.
    [19] FAA. Airport pavement design and evaluation, AC 150/5320-6E[R]. USA: [s.n.], 2009.
    [20] 袁捷, 史恩辉, 雷电, 等.上海虹桥国际机场飞机轮迹横向偏移规律研究[J].中国民航大学学报, 2015, 33(2): 1-6.
    [21] 程国勇, 张扬扬, 周浩. 机场跑道轮迹测试及横向分布参数研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2020, 37(11): 22-30.
    [22] 雷电,赵鸿铎,吴璨.飞机轮迹横向分布测试系统的比选分析[J].西部交通科技, 2021(10): 63-68.
    [23] BARNES T, DEFIORE T, MICKLOS R. Video landing parameter survey-washington national airport[J]. Environmental Science, 1999, 7: 108613011.
    [24] 张品峰,蒋小伟.考虑轮迹横向偏移的机场水泥道面分仓设计[J]. 黑龙江交通科技, 2019, 42(4): 15-16.
    [25] Aviation Safety Network. Accident description[EB/OL]. (2020-08-01) [2020-10-01]. https://aviation-safety.net/database/events/dblist.php?Event=LTLW.
    [26] 高清平.基于粗糙集理论的危险货物运输风险分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(11): 103-108.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

李岳,胡宇祺,蔡靖,戴轩.湿滑道面飞机着陆滑水风险量化分析[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2022,54(6):1138-1144

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:676
  • 下载次数: 2508
  • HTML阅读次数: 313
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-11
  • 最后修改日期:2022-11-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-05
文章二维码
您是第6934675位访问者
网站版权 © 南京航空航天大学学报
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!